Dating violence prevention curriculum video

D., LCSW violence, also known as partner violence (PV), is a major social and public health problem in the United States.For the past three decades, individuals arrested for PV have been mandated to complete a course of treatment in accordance with the various standards in the states in which they were arrested.(2013) found CBT, as well as couples therapy, to be superior to Duluth in reducing rates of recidivism. Program Characteristics: Modality, Length, Composition and Standards There does not appear to be clear-cut evidence that treatment should be limited to one particular modality. Minimal reductions in rates of recidivism have been found among Level I outcome studies, but moderate rates among Level II studies (Murphy & Ting, 2010; Jones & Gondolf, 2002). A rigorous meta-analysis of 11 Level I and II studies recently published by Miller et al. Criminal justice studies find that victims who call the police have sometimes been mistaken as perpetrators when, for example, police deem them to be too “hysterical” (typically a woman; Buzawa, Buzawa, & Stark, 2012). California law discourages mutual arrest, and the “predominant aggressor” guidelines that are supposed to protect victims from being arrested are poorly written, confusing, and without scientific merit; and the examples and scenarios contained in the Police Officers Standards and Training (POST) manual section on domestic violence define the “predominant aggressor” as male in every case (Hamel, 2011). Feminist-cognitive behavioral and process-psychodynamic treatments for men who batter.

Based on these criteria, current policies on batterer intervention are not evidence-based for a number of reasons. Approximately half of the partners of men arrested for PV in one major American city said they were minimally or only slightly afraid or thought that the partner would be violent in the future (Apsler et al., 2002). It is also the case that PV usually desists over time rather than increase in frequency (Morse, 1995; O’Leary et al., 1989), while a small percentage of offenders account for the large majority of repeat offenses (Maxwell et al., 2001). PV policy and intervention, including state batterer intervention standards, are based on recommendations from battered women’s advocates and limited to Level IV information and theory, or based on Level I-III selected data sets—e.g., relying exclusively on crime studies rather than general population studies, cherry-picking from outdated studies (Corvo et al., 2008, 2009; Hines, in press). While these organizations should be applauded for the work they have done on behalf of victims, they are an unreliable source of data on partner violence.

Search for dating violence prevention curriculum video:

dating violence prevention curriculum video-18dating violence prevention curriculum video-46

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

One thought on “dating violence prevention curriculum video”